Cell phone use has been a subject of controversy for years
with many researchers blaming cell phone radiation for an increased risk of
brain tumor or salivary gland cancer, for low motility of sperm or for behavioral
problems in children whose mothers used cell phones in excess while pregnant.
Studies have poured for years but with no clear connection
between cell phone radiation and negative effects on human body. But the
situation is not new. It took 50 years for tobacco companies to admit that
there is a clear connection between smoking and lung cancer, with many people
dying meanwhile. It could be the same situation in the case of cell phone use,
David Carpenter, director of the Institute
of Health and Environment at the University of Albany, said in testimony before a
subcommittee of the US House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and
Reform.
“Precaution is warranted even in the absence of absolutely
final evidence concerning the magnitude of the risk,” especially for children, Dr.
Carpenter added.
He was not the only scientist sustaining that there is an
increased risk of brain tumor in those exaggerating with the cell phone use.
Ronald Herberman, director of the University
of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, one of
the top US
cancer research centers, reminded the committee members that a brain tumor can
take dozens of years to develop. Therefore, more studies need to be done in
order to have a clear connection between cell phones and brain cancer. But this
should not be translated into a message like the one provided by the cell phone
makers, namely there is no evidence that cell phones have a negative impact on
our health.
In fact, Dr. Ronald Herberman is not at his first attempt to
warn people on cell phones. In a memorandum addressed to 3,000 faculty and
staff at the Pittsburgh Institute at the end of July, he cautioned about the
risks of mobile phone use. He urged his colleagues to limit mobile phone use,
especially that of their children, because of a possible risk of cancer from
electromagnetic radiation.
“Really at the heart of my concern is that we shouldn’t wait
for a definite study to come out, but err on the side of being safe rather than
sorry later,” Dr. Herberman said in the memorandum at the time.
He
also added that countries as France
and Germany have already
issued recommendations that exposure to electromagnetic fields should be
limited, while Toronto’s
Department of Public Health is urging teenagers and young children to limit
their use of cell phones in order to avoid possible health risks.
Children
are especially at danger since their organs are still developing, a process
that might be threatened by the electromagnetic radiation of cell phones, Dr.
Herberman said.
Two
months after these warnings, he and his research fellow Dr. Carpenter highlight
once again the risks of cell phone use this time in front of a US House
Committee urging for a large-scale study of the long-term effects of cell phone
use. They cited the results from a study recently presented by Dr. Lennart
Hardell of Orebro University in Sweden. According to this study,
people using cell phones have double the risk of developing malignant brain
tumors and acoustic neuromas (tumors on the hearing nerve).
Moreover,
people under age 20 were more than five times as likely to develop brain
cancer. And this should not be a curiosity considering the fact that more
children are exposed to cell phone radiation when their brain is not fully
developed. In addition to the Swedish study, Dr. Herberman held a model for lawmakers
showing how radiation from a cell phone penetrates far deeper into the brain of
a five-year-old than that of an adult.
On
the other hand, Steve Largent, CEO of CTIA (the International Association for
Wireless Telecommunications) issued a statement Wednesday saying it supports
the Federal Communications Commission’s safety guidelines, which are based “on
published scientific research showing that there is no reason for concern.” CTIA
refused to appear in front of the US House committee.