 |
|
|
Just one month ago, a study conducted by a team of American
researchers concluded that there was nothing more environmental-friendly than
the biofuel crops, that could reduce the greenhouse gas emissions by 94% and
produce five times more energy. New studies however warn that by transforming
the various ecosystems into biofuel crop fields would only accentuate the
global warming phenomenon rather than reducing it. According to the latest
estimations, converting natural ecosystems into biofuel crop fields is likely
to release up to 420 times more carbon.
“The land we’re likely to plow up is the land that we’ve had
taking up carbon for decades,” said Tim Searchinger, who conducted the
experiment along with other scientists, the Washington Post reported. “We can’t
get to a result, no matter how heroically we make assumptions on behalf of corn
ethanol, where it will actually generate greenhouse-gas benefits,” he added,
estimating that 167 years would pass before the biofuel would stop contributing
to the climate change.
There are several studies that have been conducted on the
matter; one of them, released by a team of researchers at the Princeton
University, led by Tim Searchinger, in collaboration with fellow scientists at
Woods Hole Research Center and Iowa State University, concludes that the use of
corn-based ethanol would produce twice as much greenhouse emissions in 30 years
than gasoline.
Another study conducted by a Nature Conservatory scientist
in collaboration with researchers at the University of Minnesota concluded that
by converting rainforests, peatlands and grasslands into farms for biofuel crops
would significantly increase global warming for decades to come, even
centuries. “We’re rushing into biofuels, and we need to be very careful,” said
Jason Hill from the University of Minnesota, according to the Los Angeles
Times. “It’s a little frightening to think that something this well intentioned
might be very damaging.”
© 2007 - 2009 - eFluxMedia