 |
|
|
Whoa, what a bombshell, right? Turns out Apple just announced
this year is the last that Apple attends the Macworld show, not only that but Steve
Jobs will not be making a personal final appearance at the tradeshow which has
in the past hosted so many of his keynotes. Marketing director Phil Schiller
will instead be holding the keynote.
What to make of it? Well one would immediately point the
finger at Steve Jobs’ health. Apple gave no official comment on whether it was the
reason, but spokesman Steve Dowling gave an alternate explanation: he said that
since it is Apple’s last year at the venue, it doesn’t make sense to make a
major investment in a show that it won’t be attending in the future.
The reason stands a bit shoddy, as Jobs’ Macworld keynote is
a good trade-show investment for a company if there ever was one. It usually
guarantees headlines in major circulation newspapers and business publications worldwide,
and will usually eclipse the announcements at the Consumer Electronics Show
oftentimes held in the same week. Apple would have likely benefited more by
hyping the last chance to see Steve Jobs appear at Macworld, and thus drawing
huge publicity.
It is of course possible that Jobs has delegated Schiller to
do the keynote because there simply isn’t much to say. After Apple revamped
their notebooks and iPods, and with no new iPhone foreseeable in the near
future, we’re not sure what could catch the Macworld public’s eye this year. TBR
analyst Ezra Gottheil caused a bit of a stir in predicting a low-cost netbook
from Apple, but even he admitted that was pure speculation. That’s unlikely
however, considering that Jobs recently said that Apple doesn’t know how to
create a $500 PC that lived up to its exacting quality standards.
Apple’s decision does provoke some thought though. The
company is worth some $27 billion dollars, and it automatically gets huge global
exposure from an event lasting under two hours. If Apple is beginning to think
the trade show costs can not be justified, what company can?
Apple on the other hand, as it itself points out has its own
way of reaching out to consumers that other companies don’t. It has proved it
can hold its own events very well, which is quite useful if, for instance, it
ever failed to see eye to eye with Macworld producers IDG, and decided it wanted
to fly solo. Adding to that, there are also Apple’s 250 well-located retail
stores which see 3.5 million shoppers each week, as well as its online initiatives
such as how-to videos and product intros. Maybe Apple decided that they can now
afford a measure of independence in handling their own exposure. We’ll see how
this works out. Another Steve Jobs blood pressure reading would put us more at
ease as well right about now.
© 2007 - 2009 - eFluxMedia