Sequencing the nuclear genome of extinct species has always
been a challenge for scientists, and so far, only short sequences have been
obtained due to the fact that ancient DNA is usually very fragmented and damaged. But in
the most recent study of the kind, scientists presented data on several mammoth
specimens, however focusing on one in particular, the woolly mammoth, from which
they obtained a sequence 100 more extensive than any other previous dataset.
The study, published in the journal Nature this week, is
authored by Stephan C. Schuster, professor of biochemistry and molecular biology
at Penn. State University, and Webb Miller, from Penn. State University’s
Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics, who lead a team made up of 21
researchers.
“Previous studies on extinct organisms have generated only
small amounts of data,” Schuster explained, pointing out that this
unprecedented achievement demonstrates that ancient DNA studies can be brought
up to the same level as modern genome projects.
The woolly mammoth at the center of this study originated
from Africa millions of years ago, but came to populate much of Eurasia and
North America until approximately 10,000 years ago. The ice age periods that
characterized the northern hemisphere hundreds of thousands of years ago
triggered specific changes in these mammoths, such as the shape and size of
their bodies, the thick coat, the enormous tusks or the 2-inch layer of
insulating fat tissue.
With the help of next-generation DNA-sequencing instruments
and a novel approach that reads ancient DNA very efficiently, the Penn. State
University scientists assembled data from hair shafts collected from permafrost
remains, which according to them, permitted a highly efficient decontamination
protocol, leaving the keratin-encased endogenous DNA unharmed.
In this research, the nuclear genome was extracted from hair
samples belonging to a mammoth mummy which had been buried in the Siberian
permafrost for 20,000 years, and the hair samples of a second mammoth, believed
to be at least 60,000 years old. The scientists explained that the hair shaft
protects the remnant DNA from degradation and exposure to elements, increasing
the chances to extract unharmed DNA.
Out of the 4 billion DNA bases scientists suspect comprise
the full woolly mammoth genome, only 3.3 billion DNA bases have been assigned to
the mammoth genome, scientists explained. The rest of them could also belong to
the mammoth, but the chances are that they belong to other organisms, such as
bacteria and fungi, that have contaminated the samples.
The team of researchers used the draft of an African
elephant’s genome, which is one of the mammoth’s living relatives, to make a
distinction between the sequences that belong to the mammoth and those that
belong to other organisms. “Only after the genome of the African elephant has
been completed will we be able to make a final assessment about how much of the
woolly mammoth’s genome we have sequenced,” Miller explained.
By combining the new-yielded data on the mammoth’s nuclear
genome, which comprises the genetic factors responsible for the appearance of
an organism, with previously obtained mitochondrial genome, which codes for only
13 of the 20,000 genes of the mammoth, the scientists concluded that the woolly
mammoth separated into two groups 2 million years ago, groups that eventually
turned into sub-populations. One of these populations became extinct 45,000
years ago, but the other one lived until after the last ice age, 10,000 years ago.
The analysis also
revealed stronger connections between modern-day elephants and woolly mammoths
than previously believed. As Miller explained, mammoths and modern-day
elephants separated 6 million years ago, around the same time humans and
chimpanzees separated, but their subsequent evolution occurred at a slower
pace.
The next phase of the woolly mammoth project is to try to
establish the causes of its extinction. So far, scientists have excluded the human presence
as a possible cause, since there were no humans living in Siberia 45,000 years
ago. The fact that woolly mammoths were so genetically similar to each other
suggests they were susceptible to being wiped by a disease or a change in
climate.
While trying to figure out how woolly mammoths went extinct,
scientists also explained that deciphering the genome could create the premises
to one day bring extinct species back to life.
In this respect, earlier this month, a team of Japanese
scientists reported a major breakthrough in cloning, which suggested
resurrecting extinct species is not exactly impossible. According to their
report, they’ve managed to successfully grow healthy clones from mice frozen 16
years ago in -20C conditions. The experts explained that by using brain nuclei
as donors, scientists could one day resurrect animals that have been frozen for
long periods of time without cryopreservation.