 |
|
|
On December 12, the popular
social networking web site Facebook amended a lawsuit it filed in June against
people that had unlawfully accessed its servers and looked for the web site’s
users’ personal details. Facebook’s accusations are based on information
offered by two Canadian Internet service providers, Look Communications and
Rogers Communications.
The company behind the world’s
second most popular Internet social networking web site alleged that in June
servers operated by the defendants used automated scripts to make more than
200,000 requests for personal information stored on Facebook’s own servers. Thus,
Facebook sued no less than seventeen people and an Internet porn company.
The social networking company first
filed a suit in June, but amended the complaint this month after it had
discovered the identities of a handful of those people that tried to hack its
servers. Only some of the defendants are associated with the company that pays
affiliate referrals to porn web sites. The complaint that Facebook originally
filed in summer was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District
of California and said that a certain IP address tried to access the social
networking web site’s system to reap users’ personal information between June 1
and 15, 2007. According to Facebook, despite the fact that this attempt was
unauthorized and generated error messages, the defendants tried some 200,000
times to access the information they sought, which forced Facebook to
eventually block the IP address.
However, it seems that more IP
addresses quickly picked up where the blocked one had left off. Facebook claimed
that the whole incident’s investigation cost over $5,000. A few weeks later,
Facebook and the associated Internet service providers were able to identify a
number of people associated with the IPs that had been pillaging the web site’s
servers. Brian Fabian, Josh Raskin and Ming Wu, as well as Istra Holdings, a
company associated with the sex web site SlickCash.com, were all fingered by
the Canadian ISPs.
Although Facebook hasn’t yet
mentioned whether the defendants were eventually able to access the information
they sought, the company charges that they violated the Computer Fraud and
Abuse Act, as well as the California Comprehensive Computer Data Access and
Fraud Act. They also allegedly breached the Terms of Service set forth by the
service that they agreed to upon signing up.
"The Defendants' breach of
the Terms of Service have caused and continue to cause Facebook to expend
resources to investigate the attempted unauthorized access and abuse of its
computer network and to prevent such access or abuse from occurring," said
Facebook in the amended complaint.
© 2007 - 2009 - eFluxMedia