 |
|
|
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service reported Monday that it would
not meet the Wednesday deadline for announcing a decision on listing the polar
bear as a threatened species because of global warming.
The agency has to consider whether the bear should be listed
as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.
New research has delayed the sending of the agency’s
recommendation to Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne, said the Fish and
Wildfire Service representative Valerie Fellows.
"We expect to provide a final recommendation to the
secretary of the interior and finalize the decision within the next
month," she said in a statement.
Therefore, the Center for Biological Diversity, the Natural
Resources Defense Council and Greenpeace, which had asked the administration
more than two years ago to protect the polar bear from the consequences of the global warning, have
announced they are going to file a suit Wednesday to speed up the process.
"The Bush administration has failed to do what is necessary
and once again they must be taken to court before they will act," the
California Democrat, who chairs the senate Environment and Public Works
Committee, said today.
Officials inside the Fish and Wildlife Service said the
delay was caused by receiving new information from the U.S. Geological Survey. The
USGS said in September that melting of the sea ice would lead to the death of
two-thirds of the world’s polar bear population, including all those living in Alaska by 2050.
According to data released by the National Snow and Ice Data
Center at the University of Colorado, the summer of 2007 set a record low for
sea ice in the Arctic with just 1.65 million square miles, which means nearly
40 percent less ice than long-term average between 1979 and 2000.
"We received numerous comments on the USGS reports and have been working to
analyze and respond to the information provided during the comment period," the
agency said.
Furthermore, Dale Hall, director of the Fish and Wildfire service said he
did not like missing the deadline either, but "it is far more important to use
to do it right and have it explained properly to the public," he said.
© 2007 - 2008 - eFluxMedia