 |
|
|
A Los Angeles federal judge
urged the Navy to limit the use of mid-frequency sonar within 12 miles of
Southern California, which would greatly reduce the negative impact on marine
life (whales and dolphins). The issue was stated on Thursday, and it
drastically restricts the Navy’s training missions with that particular type of
sonar, which has been ultimately linked to disoriented and panicked behavior
from whales and dolphins, and sometimes even to their death.
The decision was made by U.S.
District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper, and it is meant to avoid the use of
mid-frequency sonar within the migrating corridor the various marine mammals
use in their journey. According to federal rules, humans are to wear ear
protection when using the sonar, so why shouldn’t there be protection for the
marine wildlife too?
The Navy had previously proposed
a set of regulations on the use of mid-frequency sonar, but the federal judge
completely disagreed with them. The proposition of the Navy stated that the
sonar’s intensity should be reduced when the marine mammals approached within
1,100 yards, and shut down when the creatures get as close as 200 yards.
As a response to the Navy
proposition, the newly stated rule says that “the court is persuaded that the (protection)
scheme proposed by the navy is grossly inadequate to protect marine mammals
from debilitating levels of sonar exposure.” The judge ordered the sonar to be shut
down when the mammals are within 2,200 yards and the waters to be scouted one
hour before the exercise, in order to identify the possible presence of marine
mammals.
The Navy declared itself aware
of the damage the sonar exercises causes, estimating that a series of 14
exercises would temporarily deafen whales 8,000 times and cause permanent
injuries to over 400 mammals, but said that its soldiers need to be trained
somehow.
Jeff Davis, spokesman for the
Navy, said about the decision: “Despite the care the court took in crafting its
order, we do not believe it struck the right balance between national security
and environmental concerns.” But the environmental groups completely disagree,
as this has been a long time dream for them.
© 2007 - 2009 - eFluxMedia