Environmental conservationists groups plan to fight in court
against the US Department of the Interior, after the latter decided that gray
wolves should be removed from the endangered species list in Montana,
Wyoming and Idaho.
The US Fish and Wildlife Service has approved management
plans for all three states While Montana’s plan indicates a commitment to
conservation, Wyoming’s plan classifies wolves as predators in most of the
state, where they could be shot on sight without even a hunting license. Idaho plans on
eliminating 85 percent of the wolves in the state through hunting or state
eradication programs. The gray wolf or timber wolf, Canis lupus, is the largest
wild member of the Canidae family, weighing in at around 70–150 pounds. Environmental
groups said they are prepared to sue the government to put the animals back
under protection.
“Everyone wants to see the wolf taken off of the Endangered
Species list,” said Derek Goldman, Northern Rockies Field Representative with
the Endangered Species Coalition. “But if that happens before we have balanced,
pragmatic management plans in place, we are going to have to go through all of
this again and again. We’ve driven the football 99 yards down the field – let’s
not fumble in our haste to get into the end zone and claim victory,” said
Goldman.
The gray wolves have been recently saved from extinction,
after they were nearly wiped out in the wild. The gray wolf was listed as
endangered under the Endangered Species Act in 1973. Reintroduction efforts
placed 66 wolves in Yellowstone National Park and part of Idaho in 1995-96.
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) said it will
immediately notify the government of its intent to file a lawsuit challenging
the delisting decision. It said that it is premature to revoke endangered
species protections because the wolves have not fully recovered.
“Americans will howl with rage when they learn that their
government is jeopardizing this iconic animal,” said NRDC’s Louisa Willcox.
“Why snatch defeat from the jaws of victory when we’ve made so much progress
toward recovering wolves in the Greater Yellowstone region?”
For the Northern Rockies, independent
scientists say the recovery goal should be at least 2,500 to 5,000 wolves in at
least three interconnected populations in Idaho,
Montana and Wyoming. They say that viable populations
should also be established in Colorado, Utah, Oregon and Washington.
Even Ed Bangs, the head of the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service’s wolf recovery project, admits he thinks that 300 wolves are
not enough. In a Science Magazine article on February 15 Bangs said, “I
personally think it [the recovery goal] is too low.”
The Center for Biological Diversity and
allied conservation organizations sued the Fish and Wildlife Service over its
April 1, 2003 rule downlisting wolves from endangered to threatened - a prelude
to removing them entirely from the list of protected species. A federal court
reversed that downlisting on January 31, 2005.
“The Fish and Wildlife Service is making the same legal mistake
now as it did in 2003, and imperiling wolves’ survival,” said Michael Robinson
of the Center for Biological Diversity. “This time, just like last time, this
illegal action will not stand in court.”