A new study reports that shampoo, lotions and powders put
babies in danger as they contain chemical compounds suspected of causing
reproductive and endocrine abnormalities.
The study involved 163 babies, most white, ages 2 to 28
months, living in California, Minnesota and Missouri.
The researchers measured the levels of nine different phthalates in urine from
diapers. They also questioned the mothers about use in the previous 24 hours of
baby products including lotions, powders, diaper creams and baby wipes.
Phthalates are found in many ordinary products including
cosmetics, toys, vinyl flooring and medical supplies. They are also used to
stabilize fragrances and make plastics flexible. The substances are currently under
attack by some environmental advocacy groups, but health experts do not know
for sure what dangers, if any, they might pose. Therefore, the federal
government does not limit their use, although they are restricted in California and some
other countries.
“We found that infant exposure to phthalates is widespread, and that
exposure to personal-care products applied onto the skin may be an important
source. This is troubling, because phthalate exposure in early childhood has
been associated with altered hormone concentrations as well as increased
allergies, runny nose and eczema,” said the study’s lead author, Sheela
Sathyanarayana, an acting assistant professor of pediatrics at the University
of Washington School of Medicine.
Therefore, Sathyanarayana advised parents not to use lotions and powders on
infants at all, unless a doctor prescribes them. Parents can treat dry skin in
babies with petroleum jelly, which provides a protective barrier but is not
readily absorbed. However, water alone or shampoo used in very small amounts is
generally enough to clean infant hair. In addition, parents shall seek products
labeled “phthalate-free” to be sure their babies are safe.
“Babies don’t need lotions. It’s the one time in your life that your skin is
perfect,” Sathyanarayana said.
The study had a bad reception within the Personal Care Products Council, an
industry group. Its chief scientist, John Bailey says the study is senseless,
adding that only one of the phthalates found in babies’ urine in this study is
used in personal care products, the USA Today reported. Some of the other
phthalates detected in this study are not typically used in cosmetics,
suggesting that children were exposed another way.
Spokesperson for the Food and Drug Administration, Stephanie Kwisnek said it
“has no compelling evidence that phthalates pose a safety risk when used in
cosmetics. Should new data emerge, we will inform the public as well as the
industry,” the Associated Press reported.
In addition, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says the
health effects in humans are uncertain.
"Although several studies in people have explored possible associations
with developmental and reproductive outcomes (semen quality, genital
development in boys, shortened pregnancy, and premature breast development in
young girls), more research is needed," a 2005 CDC report said, according
to the AP.
However, Sathyanarayana said that more research is needed to determine if
exposing very young children to phthalates is linked with reproductive or other
problems. The study was published in the scientific journal Pediatrics on
Monday.