For years, Americans have been complaining that the Swedish
Academy is turning a blind eye to the U.S. - based literary works, basing their
affirmation, among others, on the fact that this year’s Nobel Literature
laureate isn’t popular in the U.S. Unfortunately, this can account for two
things: first of all, that a writer doesn’t need American approval to become a
Nobel laureate and, secondly, that we are being overly sensitive and take
another country’s success as a personal offence.
The 2008 Nobel Literature laureate is French writer
Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clezio, and his selection has caused the Nobel-related
turmoil in the
The last American writer to have won the Prize is Toni
Morrison, in the 1993 edition of the Nobel Prizes. Considering the last three
highly controversial winners – British Harold Pinter who tore the Bush
administration apart in his acceptance speech, Turkish Orhan Pamuk who was
criminally charged for a while in Turkey and British Doris Lessing who openly
and fervently lobbied for nuclear disarmament – the Americans are also under
the impression that the Nobel Prizes are also given for political
considerations, although never underestimating the quality of the winners’
works. American literature did have two chances this year, namely Philip Roth
and Joyce Carol Oates. While the latter isn’t considered “Nobel material,” Roth
wasn’t picked because he received massive support, something which the Academy
frowns upon.