NASA’s study will also try to answer the future questions
coming from Congress and the
However,
“The shuttle is an inherently risky design. We currently assess the per-mission risk as about one in 75 of having a fatal accident.”
"If one were to do, as some have suggested, fly the shuttle for an additional five years - say two missions a year - the risk would be about one in 12 that we would lose another crew," said Griffin.
However, the internal e-mail clearly says that NASA intends to find out how viable an extension of the space shuttle would be. In order to obtain the money to bankroll the “Constellation” program, the space agency would have to retire the shuttle or ask the Congress for more funds.
"We want to focus on helping bridge the gap of
NASA acknowledged the e-mail’s authenticity, but said it is just a premature stage. According to agency spokesperson John Yembrick, NASA has not finalized the parameters of the study regarding the delay of the shuttle’s retirement. "Our plan is still, of course, to retire the shuttle in 2010," he said.
The issue is politically charged. An end of the shuttle program would translate into bad news as it could mean the loss of thousands of jobs and billions of dollars spent to manufacturing the shuttle parts.
Both presidential candidates addressed the matter. Republican nominee John McCain asked NASA to delay the shuttle retirement for at least one year, while Democratic nominee Barack Obama said that NASA should be given $2 billion in order to expand the shuttle’s operations beyond 2010.
The option of getting NASA astronauts to the ISS via