“Bottle Shock,” a lenient and unsophisticated movie, not
swanky at all, but full of flavor, attempts to draw
attention on a not-so-famous moment of American history. Low budget,
self-distributed, clumsily appealing, the film made by
husband-and-wife duo Randall Miller and Jody Savin is the sort of
time-honored
The story is both really engaging and truly interesting. In
1976, at a congregation very close to Paris, a panel of wine experts carried
out a blind tasting at which two California anonymous wines triumphed over
their more famous and renowned French opponents. The incident changed the
haughty self-satisfied wine-aficionado world completely. Just out of the blue, everybody
made the astonishing discovery that
The movie also sheds light on two so-called wine-connoisseur
underdogs who are desperately craving for success. The first is Steven
Spurrier, impersonated by Alan Rickman, whose scorched soft murmur and impression
of careworn portentousness are never annoying. Moreover, Steven Spurrier is a
British wine dealer fruitlessly looking for a way to join the French
oenological organization. In spite of his skillful and perceptive nature, the
members of the establishment always slam the door in his face. Of course the
blind tasting is a trick he rustles up with his friend Maurice (Dennis Farina),
a deportee from
One of the main acting experiences in “Bottle Shock” is fashioning character progress and evolution through the tasting of the wine. Does truth lie in wine after all? Alan Rickman’s most significant challenges lie in his facial expression, as each facial muscle must move separately to transmit the fine distinctions of his tasting savoir faire. Gustavo and his father combine their lines on the poignant nature of the grapes, while Bo Barrett, drinks the wine as if it were beer (or water, depends on one’s disposition).
The film’s creators work hard to place the mesmerizing tale about the long forgotten wine industry into some kind of movie genre or another. Nevertheless, “Bottle Shock” is incapable to fathom what type of film it really is, or at least wishes to be, and madly oscillates between nutty comedy and moving drama. Although it may lack structure and cohesion at some points, the film’s loopy and eccentric spirit and scenery depict a complex and multifaceted world, which, though out-of-the-way, becomes more than catchy and likable.