Americans’ life span cannot
equal life expectancy in 41 other countries, according to a new research issued by Census Bureau and the
National
Center for Health Statistics. The
US
is surpassed by
Japan and
several European countries, but also by
Jordan,
Guam and the
Cayman Islands.
Dr. Christopher Murray, head of the Institute for Health
Metrics and Evaluation at the University
of Washington talks about
this worrying statistics result: “Something’s wrong here when one of the
richest countries in the world, the one that spends the most on health care, is
not able to keep up with other countries.”
According to international numbers provided by the Census
Bureau and domestic numbers from the National
Center for Health Statistics, life
expectancy for a baby born in 2004 is 77.9 years, placing the US on the 42th
place, after twenty years ago had the 11th rank.
The most optimistic figures are recorded in Andorra with a 83.5-years life span.
Japan, Macau,
San Marino and Singapore are
following it in the rank.
Sub-Saharan Africa has the
sad figures, but it is widely known that the area is hit by HIV and AIDS
epidemics, famine and civil rebellion. Swaziland
has the smallest figures, 34.1 years, followed by Zambia,
Angola, Liberia and Zimbabwe.
Going back to the US, researchers tried to highlight
factors that have contributed to the country’s lag. It should be acknowledged
that the Census Bureau tracks life expectancy rates from a lot more countries
than in 1980s (222 in 2004), but this does not explain the large number of
countries that surpass US.
The main factor that contributes to this situation is that
45 million Americans lack health insurance, contrary to Canada and many
European countries that have universal health care.
But let’s not be oblivious of other factors that certainly
have an important contribution. The high rates of obesity (one third of the
adults are obese), racial disparities, high infantile mortality rates, tobacco
use must be taken into account, discussions only about health insurances being
an extremely limited approach on the
matter.
Media to curb sedentary life, to reduce cancer and heart and
lung diseases, to diminish tobacco use, to control blood pressure, reduce
cholesterol and blood sugar should be considered by policymakers.
“The U.S.
has the resources that allow people to get fat and lazy. We have the luxury of
choosing a bad lifestyle as opposed to having one imposed on us by hard times,”
states Paul Terry, an assistant professor of epidemiology at Emory University
in Atlanta.
© 2007 - eFlux Media. All Rights Reserved.